Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Javid Butler wrote:
> 
> 
>>Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:36:35 -0600
>>From: Javid Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>>    <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Ethernet I/O
>>
>>Jon wrote-
>>
>>
>>>Given all the required overhead to read and write multiple
>>>packets, it is already pretty close to chewing up a whole
>>>millisecond, and there's no way it could handle even 5 KHz
>>>servo update rate.  So, I really don't think CAN is a good
>>>candidate.
>>
>>I agree. The thread started because of concern about the parport going away
>>on newer machines, and how to replace it. I have not seen any computers with
>>a CAN interface built in, which would defeat the whole purpose. We could
>>consider USB, but that has problems as well and met with resistance
>>upthread. Ethernet is relatively easy, affordable and available, and as Jon
>>mentioned before is isolated.
> 
> 
> Not arguing for CAN, but Ethernet being built-in is not a great advantage 
> unless there are 2 channels built in, since real time Ethernet (real time 
> meaning fast enough to close a servo loop) will not get along with normal 
> Ethernet traffic and a network connection is almost a necessity, requiring a 
> add-in card in most cases. Not much different from the parallel port case, 
> though faster.
RTnet solves this problem by time division multiplexing the 
ethernet, but then you need some other machine to have the dual 
ethernet ports to work as a router.  But, you only need one.

Jon

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to