On Wednesday 26 December 2007, Kenneth Lerman wrote: >Subroutines may CALL one another, but may not be defined within another. > >So... > >o100 sub >.... >o100 endsub > >o200 sub >.... >o200 endsub > >is legal. > > >o100 sub >o200 sub >... >o200 endsub >o100 endsub > >is NOT legal (subroutine declarations may not be nested). > >Ken
Many thanks Kenneth, that not so subtle difference also escaped me when I last attempted that. But I did find that o400 sub call o100 call o200 o400 endsub was apparently legal if you kept your variable numbers all separated properly. This part could stand some more emphasis in the wiki pages. Like making it an SOP. :) Thanks, and I hope Santa was good to all of you. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Satire does not look pretty upon a tombstone. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
