[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>Yep! Wilson machine bought a 50' x 4' CMM at a Boeing auction. Got it
>>>cheap and spent a million moving it and
>>>getting it set up again.  And that was only a few miles.
>>
>>Holy COW!  a 50 FOOT CMM?  There must only be 2 or 3 in the
>>entire US that big.  (I can understand why Boeing would need
>>such a machine.)
> 
> 
> 
> 50 foot at .0001 / Inch  resolution would almost be at the limit for a 32
> bit unsigned integer!  I could see some
> really strange software bugs begin to show up. (Signed vs unsigned
> integers).  Would a double precision
> float handle that?
That's a good point.  I vaguely seem to recall the OLD EMC(1) 
overflowed the 32-bit raw encoder count into a double float.
The current version just goes to a 32-bit signed value (unless 
this has been changed recently).  I was wondering if that would 
ever be a problem.

Hmm, calculating it, I get 50 * 12 * 10000 = 6 million, which is
not anywhere near 4 billion, or even +/- 2 billion, which is 
what the numerical limits of a 32-bit integer are.

I calculate that 2^31 / ( 10000 * 12) = 17896.xxx FEET, which 
sounds like it is a lot less of a problem.

Jon

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to