> So are is there any of these that follow Rs274? more or less all of the ones below follow 'standard' g-code to some extent I would think :)
To really verify what works and what doesn't on each machine is beyond what most people and companies have time/money to do. There is not much convergence towards a common standard. The CAM software vendors are happy to charge extra for a myriad of different post-processors and their annual subscriptions... It's strange that the machining industry hasn't settled on a standard language for toolpaths. Julian Todd has much more to say about this - see for example half way through this post: http://www.freesteel.co.uk/wpblog/2008/01/worknc-art-and-mori-seiki/ AW > 426_Parm_3d > DIN_ISO > Fadel_3d > Fanuc > Fanuc3d > Fanuc3x > Fanuc4ax > Haas_3x > Maho432_3d > Mikron23 > Okuma_3d > Roeders > Roeders4 > Sin810_4_3d ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
