On Sunday 23 November 2008 22:49:13 Jeff Epler wrote: > As far as I can tell, named subroutines aren't in 2.2.x. (they're in > the development version, and your test program works there) > > However, I'm not sure why you don't get an error at the first line with > "o<". That should be fixed to give a clear error message instead.
Some time ago I found some other misbehaviour. As far as I can remember, I called an O function before it was defined. That worked fine until I changed something unrelated (Some G code in another function, or something like that, dunno). Then it silently failed to call the function. (It just continued in the program without calling the function). In neither case it gave a clear error message. I can try to reproduce later. But maybe this already rings a bell. :) -- Greetings Michael. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
