Kirk Wallace wrote:

>[snip]
>
>A caveat of frame-grabbing, to me at least, is that this implies using
>video, and inexpensive video really ..... . For my application, the only
>additional cost was $30.00 for an eBay digital camera that has much
>higher resolution with great exposure and color control. To me, video is
>only good for full motion applications and requires at least an order of
>magnitude more money to get decent results. I would love to see an open
>source HD video project. The Elphel
>http://www.elphel.com/index_en.html
>
>seems to try to be open and has very good image quality.
>  
>
They're quite open, and the cameras are an excellent deal.  They even 
give you a discount if you intend to contribute back to the project 
(hosted on sourceforge, complete with FPGA code and source for all the 
applications that run on the camera).

The resolution is great, but the quality isn't that good.  I say this 
from the perspective of someone looking for photographic images rather 
than inspection, so they're likely fine for machine use.  I haven't 
tested the latest generation, I have a 333, not a 353/363.  Note that 
these cameras have no way to control iris, focus, or zoom, even if you 
use a lens that has the right motors.

POE (Power Over Ethernet) is a great feature, but it requires hardware 
that many people don't have.  I couldn't get the camera to work with the 
POE power supply they provided, but luckily it did work with the switch 
I bought for testing.

Throughput isn't great over the network, especially at higher 
resolutions (I have the 3 or 5 mpix model, it looks like they never 
released a board based on the 9 MP sensor).  It can take several seconds 
to transfer a full size image.  Video (compressed) at high resolution 
gets maybe 1-2 frames/second.

They're cool device for sure, but they may not be ideally suited to this 
application.  Oh, they also cost around $850 with the GPL discount :)

- Steve


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to