On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 21:07 -0500, Jon Elson wrote: > But, at least, you have the encoder counters running at the base-thread > rate. I was afraid you might have > been running the counter at the servo thread rate, which would really > slow the sampling rate. (Note the > above quoted numbers are NOT a recommended setting, just to show the > part of the file in question. > > > Jon
One of my replies suggested using the servo rate for the spindle. Without giving it a great amount of thought, my thinking was it might help average out any jitter by increasing the number of counts per sample. Since the spindle cannot change speed very quickly, I thought the servo update rate would be adequate. The problem with my shooting from the hip is that I could miss or shoot at the wrong target. I hope I can find some time to actually try a low count spindle to see what reality might be. -- Kirk Wallace http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/ http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/index.html California, USA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
