Sasa, >> To have complete control over my machine over telnet, I have to communicate with emcrsh and with halrmt. Am I right? <<
Yes, emcrsh basically does operational control of the machine, while halrmt provides access to hal. For the purposes of user interfaces, emcrsh is often sufficient but if you need access to hal, then use halrmt. >> Another question: I have read hear somewhere, that emcrsh is not built anymore. Is that true? << No, emcsh is not built any more, emcrsh is unaffected. It just so happens that emcrsh was based on emcsh. Regards, Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
