> Hello...
>
> I think that simplest and best way to solve that problem is to leave
> choice to users.
>
> Some great 'features' lose their shine during use.
Some not so great 'features' are very useful.
Prior to implementation/use it is difficult to evaluate the usefulness of
a feature.
In my experience the best recovery after a tool break is a rock solid
program restart.
start on any line
all conditions are implemented as if the program had not been
interrupted
program starts from the selected line (operator is responsible
for machine conditions - clearance... etc)
I have run a few machines with a button for intermediate recovery
positions. I have seldom (once or twice in 30 years) used the feature. If
someone wants to implement it I don't have a problem with having this tool
to use.
I do like the idea of allowing the user/integrator to customize the
control to personal preferences. Isn't it like that already? It is difficult
to convince people it is ok to change things in their machine control. The
idea/act of changing is scary. The freedom to change is priceless.
I love it that we are discussing esoteric items. The control is rock solid
and beyond complaint. What an amazing piece of work.
thanks
Stuart
--
dos centavos
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
