Andy, thanks for looking at this what would the 'state-machine' code look like? I would be open to learning and changing thanks Stuart
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Andy Pugh <a...@andypugh.fsnet.co.uk>wrote: > On 11 September 2010 21:27, Stuart Stevenson <stus...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Comment, suggestions, thoughts > > I'm baffled. Perhaps it would be clearer coded as a state-machine? > > -- > atp > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances > and start using them to simplify application deployment and > accelerate your shift to cloud computing > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > -- dos centavos ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
