On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Andy Pugh <[email protected]> wrote: > On 30 September 2010 12:14, yann jautard <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> At least others have already >>> pointed out that Wizard191 WAS breaking the rules in flagging 'AfD' at all! > >> *"STRONG keep* I currently use EMC2 in an industrial process, to control >> a guing machine for photovoltaic panel building. > > I am not sure that the messages extolling the virtues of EMC2 itself > are the right approach to take (though they do address the > "unremarkable software package" criticism. > > I think that perhaps the comments should address the quality of the > article (which has now much improved) > > I suspect that the original complainer fails to understand how > difficult motion control is. I rather suspect that EMC2 is more > "technical" than Audacity, for example, and that page seems safe. (I > do have some experience with audio-processing software, so know what > is going on "under the hood" there)
I think that the article was marked fro deletion because it was new and almost empty. As of now, it appears that the consensus is to keep it. I personally like Wikipedia and its process in general. i ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
