Hello, I was using Mach3 up until this past week when a couple really bad storms passed through and killed the pc running Mach3. I had already started building an EMC2 pc because I was really tired of trying to work "around" windows. So I installed EMC 2.4(?) on ubuntu 8.04 that I had already burned to cd, the PC is nothing special, an old p3-600mhz with 384mb of memory, a built in Parallel-port as port 1, an old ATI 3D rage AGP video card, and a -really- old ( but very reliable ) winbond parallel card as port 0. The drivers are xylotex.
To test it out I just used a .tap i had on a usb drive, it was a 14MB surfacing routine written line-by-line that took about 30 hours of work just to get running correctly on Mach3. EMC2 -really- impressed me, it had no problems with the gcode, and because it was about 100% smoother with the steppers, I was able to run 40ipm and complete the part in about 6 hours whereas it took me about 70 on Mach3. Anyway, I have read that EMC2 adheres really closely to the original NIST rs274ngc standard, so I would like to take advantage of subroutines so my files aren't so large ( and time consuming). I thought using O, O1, O2, etc I could specify subroutines, but EMC2 is reporting that it does not recognize the control after the O. Could someone post an example of using O correctly? or correct me if O is not how subs are implemented? Thank you Rudy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users