Les, I've run it faster w/ a lighter cut but I found that my best material 
removal rate vs accuracy was more in the 1/2-3/4" at the 100ipm. 
I used to use solidcarbide spiral type cutters, as well as compression cutters 
etc. But I've since gone back to straight
cutters where possible [for cutting wood or wood products]. The finish quality 
on the spiral cutters just wasn't up to snuff
w/ the standard router bit type cutters [straight edges].With the spiral type 
cutters the chance of chipping the top edge
was alot higher [and random], even when using compression cutters, which were 
better. The issue I had w/ compression
cutters was that I wasn't always just routing to a net shape but instead 
slotting or cutting a recess in the face etc. This would
only use the bottom [upcut] part of the bit and still allow the chipping issue. 
 I'm not sure why this is but I now rarely have edge chipping or 
edges that need dressing or touch up [I attribute it to the sqr cutting edge 
not being an 'up or down' shear cutting action].

W/ the sqr bits almost 100% of the stuff is usable straight off the table. The 
chipping was my
main concern [ie;13 ply Baltic Birch] but once I went back to the sqr cutters 
that has disappeared as an 'issue'. 

I certainly don't mind as the sqr router bits are a fair bit less money than 
the fancy spiral and compression cutting bits. The only 
negative is that you can't plung w/ them, but a 15deg ramp is no problem. A 
small price to pay for the job they do [just my
opinon].

I buy alot of my tools from Toolstoday.com


Jarrett Johnson

----- Original Message -----
From: Les Newell <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, April 28, 2011 3:43 pm
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Router Cutter v Milling Cutter

> That feed looks a little slow to me. I regularly run 4m/min 
> (160IPM) at 
> 18k RPM with a single flute 1/2" replaceable tip cutter. 
> Admittedly I 
> tend towards shallower DOC, say 10 - 12mm for a full cut. IME, for 
> spiral or PCD cutters to justify their extra cost you need to 
> really 
> work them hard. If you are running at lower speeds/feeds ordinary 
> cheap 
> 2 flute carbide cutters work well enough.
> 
> Les
> 
> On 28/04/11 18:45, H & J Johnson wrote:
> > As a comparison I typically route wood at +/-100ipm [80-130 
> typically] and 1/2" cutter at 1/2"-3/4" DOC. At these speeds a 
> full cut is possible, but
> > you need to be cranking at 18K or so [using a 3hp spindle]. This 
> equates to a 0.011" chip on  a bit w/ two cutting edges  (100ipm x 
> 2)/18000rpm= 0.011"/edge.
> >
> > 2500rpm at 8ipm is a 0.0016" chip [assuming the two cutting 
> edges again]  I'd think if you ran it faster [IPM] it would work
> > better and last longer. When I'm done cutting I can grab the 
> cutter right out of the spindle and its not even hardly warm
> > [certainly not 'hot']. They don't last forever but I have been 
> able to get many thousands of inches from a good quality carbide 
> router> bit.
> >
> > This is in cutting both MDF and various solid and laminated woods.
> >
> > FWIW
> >
> > Jarrett Johnson
> >
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
> The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network 
> management toolset available today.  Delivers lowest initial 
> acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network 
management toolset available today.  Delivers lowest initial 
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to