On 22 July 2011 03:28, Michael Haberler <mai...@mah.priv.at> wrote: > I think one would need to keep its limitations in mind - it's a > pick-and-wire-components thing, and if you need more than a 'instantaneous > propagation of int/bool/float values' paradigm you'd be hard pressed to > invent a mechanism which adds that in a remotely harmonic fashion.
It isn't actually instantaneous, the functions run in a strict sequence. I think I saw a way to move functions round in the sequence, but can't see it now, so might be imagining things. This can be important, you generally want to run a function before you use its results, though generally you won't notice the delay. (As an aside, that does mean that you could set up a delay-line by deliberately running functions out of sequence) -- atp "Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10 Tips for Better Web Security Learn 10 ways to better secure your business today. Topics covered include: Web security, SSL, hacker attacks & Denial of Service (DoS), private keys, security Microsoft Exchange, secure Instant Messaging, and much more. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426210/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
