2012/1/25 Viesturs Lācis <[email protected]> > 2012. gada 25. Jan. 19:39 "Roland Jollivet" <[email protected]> > rakstīja: > > > > > > > Haha. Sorry, it's funny. The BD139 is a NPN, so the position was right, > but > > the symbol should have been changed from PNP to NPN. Otherwise, you can > > leave the new drawing as is, but label it as a BD138. > > > > The BD138 is PNP. > > > > So does ot mean that existing scheme is correct? > Then what else might be wrong? > > Viesturs > > All I'm saying is; BD138 is PNP BD139 is NPN
Just make sure that the symbol used matches the description, otherwise if you automatically place the part, you'll have the wrong pin layout. Kirk modified the cct for a PNP, but kept the label as a BD139. No value is shown for R3. I think 1K should be fine. Regards Roland ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
