On Thu, Feb 2, 2012, at 09:11 AM, John Kasunich wrote: > > If you are going to invent a black box (parser, whatever) that > takes in some new dialog and spits out g-code, without doing
I meant "dialect", not "dialog", sorry > all the checks that the interpreter eventually will do, please > think about the machinist. When the interpreter eventually > does spit out an error that says "G3 line 125 endpoint doesn't > match", will the user be able to correlate that to the error > in his actual program? Especially if the new dialect doesn't > even use the term "G3", or if the translator doesn't preserve > line numbers (perhaps by discarding comments or blank lines). > -- John Kasunich jmkasun...@fastmail.fm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users