On Thu, Feb 2, 2012, at 09:11 AM, John Kasunich wrote:
> 
> If you are going to invent a black box (parser, whatever) that
> takes in some new dialog and spits out g-code, without doing

I meant "dialect", not "dialog", sorry

> all the checks that the interpreter eventually will do, please
> think about the machinist.  When the interpreter eventually
> does spit out an error that says "G3 line 125 endpoint doesn't
> match", will the user be able to correlate that to the error
> in his actual program?  Especially if the new dialect doesn't
> even use the term "G3", or if the translator doesn't preserve
> line numbers (perhaps by discarding comments or blank lines).
>
-- 
  John Kasunich
  jmkasun...@fastmail.fm


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to