On 2/11/2012 10:51 AM, BRIAN GLACKIN wrote:
> "One question, from someone who hasn't used CAM. The CAM package would
> provide a way to specify the number of tool passes, to reach the final
> depth of a machining operation?"
>
> I recently went away from redundant gcode lines with the added tool paths
> for each z
> by passing a file with the xy cut to a subroutine that parsed through the z
> depths.  I pass to the subroutine; filename, final z, and z increment.
>
> This means I generate more files with the single toolpath, but it is
> infintely more readable to me.
>
> Brian
Yes, much more readable. The downside is that you can't do a "restart at 
line" without specifying which iteration of the outer loop to restart 
from. And neither the GUIs nor the "runtime" support that.

Ken

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Virtualization&  Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
> also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to