Have to completely disagree here.

I have a Taig mill with a 20TPI leadscrew driven by A G540 from Mach3.
I limit my rapids to 60IPM which is 40Ksteps/sec

Mach3 has had a max steps/sec of 45K for about a decade.

Mach3 now generates up to 100K steps/sec, So it  20K steps/sec is nowhere
near the limit. That said I not sure what LinuxCNC's limit is though.

 

Cheers,

 

Peter.

--------------------------- 
Peter Homann 
http://www.homanndesigns.com/store

On Tue 17/04/12 11:28 AM , Jon Elson  wrote:Kirk Wallace wrote:
 >
 >
 > Most of the components on the G540 are SMT and too small to have
 > markings, so I could only guess about what they are. I have some close
 > up pictures of the area in question, but my camera's cable has woken up
 > and run off somewhere. I'll post the pictures when I get this sorted
 > out.
 >
 Most of those tiny parts have a 2 or 3 letter code that can be looked up
to
 tell what part it is.
 > On the other hand I'm thinking I'll need to deal with the G540 as it
is.
 >
 > I'm still concerned that the G540's 10x microstepping would put it out
 > of the parallel port arena. It seems a 5i25 would be more appropriate,
 > plus taking into account other savings the 5i25 might provide, might
 > make it cost similar to a PCI parallel port and buffer board. Trying a
 > Pluto-P is on my to-do list.
 >
 Right, 10X microstepping on small motors with fine-pitch leadscrews end
up
 needing a fast step rate. Assuming 2000 (micro) steps per rev, and
wanting
 maybe 30 IPM on a Sherline or Taig with a 20 TPI leadscrew, that is
 30 * 20 = 600 RPM or 10 RPS. 10 RPS * 2000 = 20,000 steps/second.
 This is doable with software stepping, but near the limit. And, the step
 timing becomes jumpy at the high end. It is barely humming for a hardware
 step generator, however. They can easily go ten times faster and more.
 Well, maybe you will have luck with the Pluto, but others have had
 problems with it.

 Jon


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
 monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
 resolution app monitoring today. Free.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev [1]"
target="_blank">http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
 _______________________________________________
 Emc-users mailing list
 Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users [2]

-------------------------
Message sent via Atmail Open - http://atmail.org/

Links:
------
[1] http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
[2]
http://webmail.homanndesigns.com/parse.php?redirect=https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to