Dave Caroline wrote: > Lester, er the real problem is repeated infestations, that is not googles > fault But the 'primary listing' that google creates should at least contain live information rather than cached stuff. What is even more irritating is that they have flagged compromised pages so they know what pages need reviewing, but we have to ask for that to happen. Perhaps I've been lucky, but I've never seen the download page 'compromised' so it does seem even more strange that google manage to cache the problem version and not clean ones?
-- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
