On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Erik Christiansen <dva...@internode.on.net> wrote: >> On 5/18/2012 4:28 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: >> > BTW, now that we can't use EMC2 any more, and LinuxCNC seems longish >> > and awkward to type, I am tempted to start using LCNC.
> Err, are we to be the group with no name? We didn't defend the one we > had, and now we seek to discard our new common banner. You're quite right, I wasn't suggesting this as an official name but more in the context of informal communications related to LinuxCNC, where we mention LinuxCNC often and seeing the LinuxCNC term multiple times next to other mentions of LinuxCNC might just seem visually crowded because LinuxCNC 'glyph' is fairly long and busy graphically. For instance, in the source code, there are 55246 instances of the trigraph EMC, and replacing all of them by LinuxCNC might make the code slightly less readable, so something like 'lcnc' might be a reasonable compromise. Anyway, I start to feel like I'm bikeshedding so I will stop now. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
