On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Jon Elson <el...@pico-systems.com> wrote:
> Dave Caroline wrote: > > I have spent a while trying to get the APT360 version 64bit compliant > > and have to agree about common block missmatch. > > This code does have unmatched common blocks in differing phases of the > code > > which Im not sure f2c and gcc get right. > > > The only solution is to make the common blocks an include file. If the > compiler doesn't > support that, write a script that inserts the include file at the right > point. Edit the files > in the raw form, the script inserts the commons, and then the compiler > processes > the processed files. > a kind of fortran++? > > f2c has trouble with some of the evil constructs that APT uses > > > Hopefully no computed goto's and 1960-vintage syntax of that sort. > Also, the Hollerith-encoded char strings are machine dependent. > > Jon > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > -- dos centavos ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
