On 09/15/2012 01:26 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> If there will be a well-designed and/or inexpensive hardware with this
> chipset, it'll likely get reverse-engineered.
   Years ago I worked on an in-circuit test for a device called a bus 
monitor chip.  It was supposed to be able to monitor memory and IO read 
and writes, and store a count of accesses to a certain address, or just 
look for and access in a certain range, and store it and generate an 
interrupt.  The chip hadn't gotten to the point where it had full data 
sheet functionality, but in theory would have made watching to see how 
the other operating system did things a lot easier.

   These days, I would guess that all that could be put into an FPGA and 
designed into a PCIX card.  Could probably even have a serial port to a 
terminal to let another computer log all the interesting memory 
accesses.  If it came time to pull the gloves off, I'd bet there are 
plenty of Linux guys (and girls) out there who would be able to figure 
out the hardware that way.  Intel might not care if independently a 
Linux distro came out designed for those devices, as long as they had 
nothing to do with it..

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to