On 9/19/2012 4:12 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 19 September 2012 19:37, Roland Jollivet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Considering the near obsoletion of the parallel port, and the latency of
>> USB, is it not possible to do CNC control using the SMBus as part of the
>> PCI bus?
> There are many PCI io options, and ethernet (RTNet) ones on the way.
> Besides, the P-Port has been about to disappear for decades, and still
> seems to be there.
>

I agree, Andy, but it would seem useful to continue discussing the 
various interfaces that exist today and summarize the discussion on the 
Wiki, which has a somewhat outdated and incomplete page on the subject.

Serial and PS/2 ports, if they still exist, are not viable choices.

USB appears to be out, although I suppose USB3 has to be looked at if 
only to be sure it still doesn't fit the timing model.

Parallel ports are getting harder to find on motherboards...one has to 
do due diligence to pick out a new board (wouldn't it be nice if someone 
had a web service that scrapped motherboard info from various vendor 
sites and allowed filtering on *any* such characteristic?). Intel is 
playing a fan dance; sometimes you see a parallel port on a newly 
announced board, whether brought out to a rear connector or not, 
sometimes you don't. Many of the other vendors just implement Intel 
reference designs in slightly different configurations.

In the same way that the parallel port has been slowly disappearing we 
have PCI slots slowly disappearing with the possibility that only PCIe 
will remain. I don't know enough about the PCIe characteristics.

As a wild hair, I've often wondered if one of the multiple SATA 
controllers that appear on most x86 boards could be pressed into 
service, but I don't know enough about the SATA characteristics.

I wish real-time ethernet solutions weren't still "on the way." I got 
pretty enthusiastic about RTnet several years ago but I quickly realized 
fancy footwork was required at both ends of the communications. I could 
easily envision communicating motherboard-to-motherboard but 
communicating motherboard-to-(drive /or pulse generator) wasn't so 
obvious. I suppose this would be another "opportunity" for me to learn 
how to use FPGAs:-)

Just my 2cents worth.

Regards,
Kent


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to