Thanks Erik, that is the kind of information I have been looking for. 
Much appreciated.

On 2013/08/18 12:14 PM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 15.08.13 06:13, John Thornton wrote:
>> In the Machinery's Handbook it has charts about various thread limits
>> based on amount of engagement and some text that says "In general when
>> the engagement length is one and one half times the nominal diameter a
>> 50 or 55 per cent thread is satisfactory."
> That matches what I've been using, from this table:
>
>     ----------------------------------------------------
>     Metric Coarse              | BS 4168 Clearance hole:
>      |                         |      Type of fit:
>     Size     Drill  E    Core  |  Close Medium   Free
>     ----------------------------------------------------
>     M2       1.70  61%   1.51  |
>     M2.5     2.15  63%   1.95  |                       NOTES:
>     M3       2.60  65%   2.39  |  3.2   3.4      3.6   2.5mm drill -> 82%.
>     M4       3.40  70%   3.14  |  4.3   4.5      4.8
>     M5       4.40  61%   4.02  |  5.3   5.5      5.8   With a nut length of
>     M6       5.20  65%   4.70  |  6.4   6.6      7.0   1.5 * diameter, 50%
>     M8       6.90  72%   6.47  |  8.4   9.0     10.0   engagement is stronger
>     M10      8.70  71%   8.16  | 10.5  11.0     12.0   than the external 
> thread.
>     M12     10.50  70%   9.85  | 13.0  14.0     15.0
>     M16     14.25  71%  13.55  |                       For CI and thin sheet,
>     -------------------------------------------------- stick near 75%.
>
>     E is engagement. Some of those drill sizes are easier to get than others,
>     so a quick calculation can be made, using:
>
>                                # d is full thread depth.
>     Drill_Size = OD - (E*2d)   # E is engagement.
>                                # d = kP , where  P is thread pitch.
>
>     Or transposed for E:    E = (OD - Drill_Size)/2d
>   
>                                &  k is:    ISO Metric       0.613
>                                            UNF/UNC          0.613
>      # British Association                 BA               0.600
>      # BSW, BSF, ME (32 & 40 TPI),         Whitworth forms  0.640
>      # BSB, and BSP parallel.
>
>     Especially with smaller taps, it's also relevant that the torque
>     required to drive the tap doubles from 60% to 80% thread engagement,
>     with half the increase occurring between 75% and 80%. Some say:
>
>     To avoid breaking small taps, a guide for Al, brass, and steel is:
>        < 6 mm: ~ 60% thread engagement
>     6 - 10 mm: 70%
>       > 10 mm: 75%
>
>     and 75% engagement is as high as I'd go, normally.
>
>     The table and equation came from issue 104 of Model Engineering
>     Workshop, and has worked for me so far.
>
>     Erik
>     

-- 
Regards / Groete

Marius D. Liebenberg
MasterCut cc
Cel: +27 82 698 3251
Tel: +27 12 743 6064
Fax: +27 86 551 8029
Skype: marius_d.liebenberg



---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 130817-1, 2013/08/17
Tested on: 2013/08/18 12:51:14 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2013 AVAST Software.
http://www.avast.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. 
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to