Here is an example of where the new TP shines... This is a 533k program made up of short line segments. G64P.0025Q.0025
Old TP http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/testing/Screenshot%20from%202014-02-08%2015:27:59.png New TP http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/testing/Screenshot%20from%202014-02-08%2020:54:20.png Great work rob! sam On 01/26/2014 03:10 PM, sam sokolik wrote: > This is an extension of the 'slow gcode' thread. The work that Robert > has done on the TP are now in the beta stage. (has been for a little > while - but I forgot to post anything about it on the user list.. :( ) > > I think the best way forward is to look at the thread on the forum and > follow the directions to build it. (if you are wanting to test the new TP) > > http://www.linuxcnc.org/index.php/english/forum/10-advanced-configuration/27368-new-trajectory-planner-testersprograms-wanted > > currently the new TP improves the path velocity (by read ahead) if the > segments are > > Line-line > Tangent line-arc > Tangent arc-arc > > Here are a couple screenshots.. This is showing a simple program (one > rogge had posted a while back with an entry/exit move ) > > % > (1" square with rounded corners) > G90 G54 G20 > g64p.001q.001 > G0 X0 Y.25 Z.25 > z0 > G1 Y.75 F999 > G2 X.25 Y1 I.25 > G1 X.75 > G2 X1 Y.75 J-.25 > G1 Y.25 > G2 X.75 Y0 I-.25 > G1 X.25 > G2 X0 Y.25 J.25 > g0z.25 > M30 > > http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/testing/screenshots/Screenshot%20from%202014-01-26%2014:53:00.png > > This is running new TP strait G64 - peaks at 222ipm > http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/testing/screenshots/Screenshot%20from%202014-01-26%2014:34:21.png > > Old TP running strait G64 - peaks at 159ipm > http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/testing/screenshots/Screenshot%20from%202014-01-26%2014:36:20.png > > This is the new TP running G64P.001Q.001 Still peaks at 222ipm - just > slows a bit at the sharp corners. > http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/testing/screenshots/Screenshot%20from%202014-01-26%2014:42:11.png > > Old TP running G64P.001Q.001 - slows down a lot more.. (I think mainly > because the parabolic blend needs to be slowed down quite a bit compared > to the circular blend to match the path) > http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/testing/screenshots/Screenshot%20from%202014-01-26%2014:40:36.png > > Thanks all goes to Robert - he has coded this all on his own.. (again - > impressive) > > sam > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. > Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For > Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. > Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
