I had a copy on an old stick. T4 dia is .05 in the tool table This is the 45deg tool to break the edge but still roughly the same code as the end mill code. You will have to change the feedrate to really test the speed as this feedrate works fine with old tp(at least on my VMC it does. I use v 2.5.0
% T4 M6 G0 G90 G54 X-2.2343 Y2.1193 S6000 M3 G43 H4 Z.25 M8 Z.1 G1 Z-.045 F100. G41 D4 X-2.1989 Y2.084 G3 X-2.1636 Y2.0694 I.0353 J.0353 X-2.1282 Y2.084 J.0499 G1 X-2.0686 Y2.1436 G2 X-2.0509 Y2.1509 I.0177 J-.0177 G1 X-2.0505 G2 X-1.2341 Y1.8359 I-.024 J-1.2776 G3 X-1.1338 Y1.8012 I.1003 J.1278 X-.9713 Y1.9637 J.1625 X-.9729 Y1.9867 I-.1625 G2 X-.9969 Y2.2332 I1.2538 J.2465 X-.8375 Y2.8512 I1.2778 X-.8221 Y2.8633 I.0219 J-.0121 G1 X-.7197 Y2.8907 G2 X-.7132 Y2.8916 I.0065 J-.0242 X-.7003 Y2.888 J-.0251 X-.1508 Y2.2069 I-.6596 J-1.0945 G3 X0. Y2.105 I.1508 J.0606 X.1508 Y2.2069 J.1625 G2 X.7003 Y2.888 I1.2091 J-.4134 X.7132 Y2.8916 I.0129 J-.0215 X.7197 Y2.8907 J-.0251 G1 X.8221 Y2.8633 G2 X.8375 Y2.8512 I-.0065 J-.0242 X.9969 Y2.2332 I-1.1184 J-.618 X.9729 Y1.9867 I-1.2778 G3 X.9713 Y1.9637 I.1609 J-.023 X1.1338 Y1.8012 I.1625 X1.2341 Y1.8359 J.1625 G2 X2.0505 Y2.1509 I.8404 J-.9626 G1 X2.0509 G2 X2.0686 Y2.1436 J-.025 G1 X2.1436 Y2.0686 G2 X2.1509 Y2.0509 I-.0177 J-.0177 G1 Y2.0505 G2 X1.8359 Y1.2341 I-1.2776 J.024 G3 X1.8012 Y1.1338 I.1278 J-.1003 X1.9637 Y.9713 I.1625 X1.9867 Y.9729 J.1625 G2 X2.2332 Y.9969 I.2465 J-1.2538 X2.8512 Y.8375 J-1.2778 X2.8633 Y.8221 I-.0121 J-.0219 G1 X2.8907 Y.7197 G2 X2.8916 Y.7132 I-.0242 J-.0065 X2.888 Y.7003 I-.0251 X2.2069 Y.1508 I-1.0945 J.6596 G3 X2.105 Y0. I.0606 J-.1508 X2.2069 Y-.1508 I.1625 G2 X2.888 Y-.7003 I-.4134 J-1.2091 X2.8916 Y-.7132 I-.0215 J-.0129 X2.8907 Y-.7197 I-.0251 G1 X2.8633 Y-.8221 G2 X2.8512 Y-.8375 I-.0242 J.0065 X2.2332 Y-.9969 I-.618 J1.1184 X1.9867 Y-.9729 J1.2778 G3 X1.9637 Y-.9713 I-.023 J-.1609 X1.8012 Y-1.1338 J-.1625 X1.8359 Y-1.2341 I.1625 G2 X2.1509 Y-2.0505 I-.9626 J-.8404 G1 Y-2.0509 G2 X2.1436 Y-2.0686 I-.025 G1 X2.0686 Y-2.1436 G2 X2.0509 Y-2.1509 I-.0177 J.0177 G1 X2.0505 G2 X1.2341 Y-1.8359 I.024 J1.2776 G3 X1.1338 Y-1.8012 I-.1003 J-.1278 X.9713 Y-1.9637 J-.1625 X.9729 Y-1.9867 I.1625 G2 X.9969 Y-2.2332 I-1.2538 J-.2465 X.8375 Y-2.8512 I-1.2778 X.8221 Y-2.8633 I-.0219 J.0121 G1 X.7197 Y-2.8907 G2 X.7132 Y-2.8916 I-.0065 J.0242 X.7003 Y-2.888 J.0251 X.1508 Y-2.2069 I.6596 J1.0945 G3 X0. Y-2.105 I-.1508 J-.0606 X-.1508 Y-2.2069 J-.1625 G2 X-.7003 Y-2.888 I-1.2091 J.4134 X-.7132 Y-2.8916 I-.0129 J.0215 X-.7197 Y-2.8907 J.0251 G1 X-.8221 Y-2.8633 G2 X-.8375 Y-2.8512 I.0065 J.0242 X-.9969 Y-2.2332 I1.1184 J.618 X-.9729 Y-1.9867 I1.2778 G3 X-.9713 Y-1.9637 I-.1609 J.023 X-1.1338 Y-1.8012 I-.1625 X-1.2341 Y-1.8359 J-.1625 G2 X-2.0505 Y-2.1509 I-.8404 J.9626 G1 X-2.0509 G2 X-2.0686 Y-2.1436 J.025 G1 X-2.1436 Y-2.0686 G2 X-2.1509 Y-2.0509 I.0177 J.0177 G1 Y-2.0505 G2 X-1.8359 Y-1.2341 I1.2776 J-.024 G3 X-1.8012 Y-1.1338 I-.1278 J.1003 X-1.9637 Y-.9713 I-.1625 X-1.9867 Y-.9729 J-.1625 G2 X-2.2332 Y-.9969 I-.2465 J1.2538 X-2.8512 Y-.8375 J1.2778 X-2.8633 Y-.8221 I.0121 J.0219 G1 X-2.8907 Y-.7197 G2 X-2.8916 Y-.7132 I.0242 J.0065 X-2.888 Y-.7003 I.0251 X-2.2069 Y-.1508 I1.0945 J-.6596 G3 X-2.105 Y0. I-.0606 J.1508 X-2.2069 Y.1508 I-.1625 G2 X-2.888 Y.7003 I.4134 J1.2091 X-2.8916 Y.7132 I.0215 J.0129 X-2.8907 Y.7197 I.0251 G1 X-2.8633 Y.8221 G2 X-2.8512 Y.8375 I.0242 J-.0065 X-2.2332 Y.9969 I.618 J-1.1184 X-1.9867 Y.9729 J-1.2778 G3 X-1.9637 Y.9713 I.023 J.1609 X-1.8012 Y1.1338 J.1625 X-1.8359 Y1.2341 I-.1625 G2 X-2.1509 Y2.0505 I.9626 J.8404 G1 Y2.0509 G2 X-2.1436 Y2.0686 I.025 G1 X-2.1282 Y2.084 G3 X-2.1136 Y2.1193 I-.0354 J.0353 X-2.1282 Y2.1547 I-.05 G1 G40 X-2.1636 Y2.19 Z.055 F20. G0 Z.25 M5 G91 G28 Z0. M9 M30 % On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Robert Ellenberg <rwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Terry, that's a good idea. I suspect G41/G42 won't affect much since the > offsets are applied before the path is sent to the motion module, but it > would be nice to be sure. Do you have a program handy that use G41/42 > extensively? If so, I'd be happy to add it to the tests I run. > > -Rob > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:54 PM, TERRY Christophersen <tcninj...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Have you tried the new tp with g41/g42? Im sure it wont matter but just > in > > case... > > > > Terry > > One thing I have noticed - with the new TP - the path reaches commanded > > speed. mach gets close but is usually a few percent under. > > > > Take this program steve posted a while back. ( > > http://electronicsam.com/images/KandT/testing/steve.ngc ) > > > > New TP > > http://imagebin.org/296859 > > If you calculate it out - it is about 3600mm/min. that is the commanded > > velocity (following path within .1mm aprox .004") it actually > > finishes a whole .5 seconds faster ;) > > > > With Mach > > http://imagebin.org/296858 > > it peaks at about 3300mm/min. > > > > sam (having too much fun...) > > > > > > > > On 2/20/2014 10:37 AM, sam sokolik wrote: > > > Steve! > > > > > > Here is your sample of gcode running the newest TP > > > > > > Original TP > > > http://imagebin.org/294551 (limit of the 1 segment look-ahead) > > > > > > New TP (which does arc-arc , Line-arc and line-line look-ahead.) > > > http://imagebin.org/294550 > > > > > > Robs hard work is awesome! (and it keeps improving) > > > > > > sam > > > > > > > > > On 04/07/2013 05:28 PM, Steve Blackmore wrote: > > >> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 10:21:11 -0500, you wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 10:13:11AM +0100, Steve Blackmore wrote: > > >>>> CV in LinuxCNC still does not work well. Have a look at this > > >>>> > > >>>> http://youtu.be/ph_IVXg1C9Y > > >>> Please share your gcode and your full config directory. > > >> Hi Chris - Here's part of the code - it's obvious early on without all > > >> of it. I'll post the config tomorrow - machine is at work. > > >> > > >> BTW - Changing N190 to > > >> > > >> N190 G64 P0.5 > > >> > > >> and it runs better, but that's far too much deviation. > > >> > > >> This was first reported on 26th July 2011 in a post > > >> "trying to understand EMC's operation" > > >> Have a read of that thread for way more information. Daniel Rogge > > >> concurs in his tests posted on 29th. > > >> > > >> I've re posted as this is still occurring since V2.4 ! > > >> > > >> N100 G0 G21 G17 G90 G40 G49 G80 > > >> N110 G91.1 > > >> N120 G1 Z20.000 F3600.0 > > >> N130 T1 M06 > > >> N140 (End Mill {6 mm}) > > >> N150 G43H1 Z20.000 > > >> N160 S12000 M03 > > >> N170(Toolpath:- Profile 1) > > >> N180() > > >> N190 G64 > > >> N200 G1 X0.000 Y0.000 F3600 > > >> N210 G0 X-1.974 Y8.147 Z6.000 > > >> N220 G1 X-1.974 Y8.147 Z-1.000 F1200.0 > > >> N230 G2 X-1.346 Y40.813 I1274.739 J-8.173 F3600.0 > > >> N240 G1 X-1.246 Y43.543 Z-1.000 > > >> N250 G1 X-1.175 Y44.975 Z-1.000 > > >> N260 G2 X0.630 Y65.631 I357.751 J-20.852 > > >> N270 G2 X3.629 Y86.169 I356.674 J-41.593 > > >> N280 G1 X3.738 Y86.813 Z-1.000 > > >> N290 G1 X3.885 Y87.608 Z-1.000 > > >> N300 G1 X4.121 Y88.649 Z-1.000 > > >> N310 G1 X4.891 Y91.654 Z-1.000 > > >> N320 G2 X8.045 Y101.818 I125.643 J-33.412 > > >> N330 G2 X12.017 Y111.685 I122.371 J-43.533 > > >> N340 G1 X12.167 Y112.021 Z-1.000 > > >> N350 G1 X12.392 Y112.507 Z-1.000 > > >> N360 G1 X12.836 Y113.360 Z-1.000 > > >> N370 G1 X14.404 Y116.145 Z-1.000 > > >> N380 G2 X48.101 Y150.602 I84.920 J-49.341 > > >> N390 G2 X94.143 Y164.886 I51.247 J-83.839 > > >> N400 G1 X98.585 Y165.027 Z-1.000 > > >> N410 G2 X107.856 Y164.832 I1.550 J-146.800 > > >> N420 G1 X114.650 Y164.312 Z-1.000 > > >> N430 G1 X121.416 Y163.467 Z-1.000 > > >> N440 G1 X124.191 Y163.060 Z-1.000 > > >> N450 G1 X127.048 Y162.615 Z-1.000 > > >> N460 G2 X139.931 Y159.885 I-25.733 J-153.243 > > >> N470 G2 X152.544 Y156.073 I-38.655 J-150.662 > > >> N480 G1 X157.534 Y154.334 Z-1.000 > > >> N490 G1 X161.108 Y153.062 Z-1.000 > > >> N500 G2 X183.667 Y143.969 I-122.738 J-337.027 > > >> N510 G2 X205.551 Y133.371 I-145.209 J-327.734 > > >> N520 G1 X207.732 Y132.276 Z-1.000 > > >> N530 G1 X215.815 Y128.556 Z-1.000 > > >> N540 G1 X219.037 Y127.150 Z-1.000 > > >> N550 G1 X222.272 Y125.782 Z-1.000 > > >> N560 G1 X223.416 Y125.300 Z-1.000 > > >> N570 G1 X223.904 Y125.085 Z-1.000 > > >> N580 G3 X237.774 Y120.073 I38.168 J83.912 > > >> N590 G3 X252.272 Y117.334 I24.318 J88.999 > > >> N600 G1 X253.479 Y117.248 Z-1.000 > > >> > > >> Steve Blackmore > > >> -- > > >> > > >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. > > >> Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire > > >> the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the > > >> Employer Resources Portal > > >> http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Emc-users mailing list > > >> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications > > > Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. > > > Read the Whitepaper. > > > > > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Emc-users mailing list > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to > > Perforce. > > With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. > > Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and > > the > > freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. > > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > _______________________________________________ > > Emc-users mailing list > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to > > Perforce. > > With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. > > Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and > > the > > freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. > > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > _______________________________________________ > > Emc-users mailing list > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to > Perforce. > With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. > Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and > the > freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
