I am just hoping that we see things move a lot faster than linuxcnc 
development.

I moved away from linuxcnc many years ago to "the other one"
But as soon as the beaglebone/machinekit was announced i thought wow 
things are moving on.
But unfortunately it seems this is not the case.

I remember complaining about the TP then, and it has not moved on at all.
And i summize it still would not have, if it were not for Rob's code and 
Sam's Debugging.
Anyway i am sure that this announcement will only make things better for 
everyone,just a shame it could not have been a bit more of a 
collaberation rather than two separate things.

I am trying to give the linuxcnc/machinekit setup a fair crack of the 
whip but it really does seem to be held up by the "inner circle" of 
Linuxcnc developers.

I still greatly appreciate The many developers on both projects but 
there does seem to be a total breakdown when it comes to collaberation.

I am only an end user that want's to make chip's but at the end of the 
day that is what it is all about.

So i say good luck to the new machinekit project and i will be following 
every step as usual.




On 03/04/14 16:49, Bas Laarhoven wrote:
> On 3-4-2014 17:20, andy pugh wrote:
>> On 3 April 2014 15:26, Michael Haberler <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> We are pleased to announce the formation of the Machinekit project 
>>> [1][2][3].
>> I have no idea what this means.
>>
> Progress (I hope).
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to