> I'd rather try to do it the other way round, i.e. instead of simulating > a faster machine, better simulate the same machine with faster time. In > fact, it should be possible to make the servo thread as fast as possible > for the computer, while telling it that the time passes at 1ms/iteration > (or whatever the nominal servo period is). However, I don't know if > there are other parts in LinuxCNC having their own timebase. And the > interpreter would have to run much faster too, which (as far as I know) > does not run in the servo thread. > > So it will still be a bit tricky, but should be possible. > > Regards, > Philipp
I done the similar before instead of simulating a faster machine in sort of simulate the same machine with faster time although it was not a machine that time. Have no idea how it is implemented right now but said it before. It should be simpler if thread is implemented as function called regularly. Then it could be called from: real time operating system, inside interrupt routine, from a loop in a simulation script. Nicklas Karlsson ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
