On Friday 07 April 2017 12:32:33 Peter C. Wallace wrote: > On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Do we have a latency test that can monitor a running system? I've > > not had luck running it on a live, moving system. It seems to be > > mutually exclusive. > > You can use the tmax parameters for each function to see the worst > case times, and the corresponding time pins to get an idea of the > average times. > I hadn't thought of that. I guess thats why I don't get the big bucks. ;-) I'll see if there is a huge difference anyplace of note. That s/b non-volatile so I should be looking at data thats been collecting all night.
looking at motion-command-handler tmax-increased is false. tmax is 161822, time is 25xx worst case (these are on an idling system) looking at motion.controller, tmax-increased is also false. tmax is 214426, and time is 31xxx worst case, so neither is using anywhere near its allocated time ATM. On the face of it, there should not be a problem. Famous last words... This I think is good. Is it not? Or should I be looking at and adding up the rest of the times too? Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
