Your results are atypical.  It could be however the fault of the OS.   Each
bit in an SSD has a certain number of read/write cycles before it might
fail.  Some million of cycles.  Back in the "old days" some OSes would
write continously to the same place on the drive.   For example you'd
delete a file and then when a new file is created it would use the recently
freed space.   Today on modern computers with modern OSes systems are
designed to spread the usage evenly all over the drive.

With a hard drive you WANT to bunch all your data so that itis physically
close to minimized head movements but on an SSD you want the data dispersed

Linux has a habit of creating and deleting tiny files like log files and
such and making files in /tmp and would trash the SSD that was not wear
leveled

I think those days are over.  New SSD have built-in wear leveling.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wear_leveling

The question is about older or even antique Linux systems, do they know how
to enable wear leveling on SSDs?   I don't know when this was introduced to
Linux.

Fast forward to the year 2020...  Today we don't use SSDs that are made to
look like HDD and are put inside of a box with a SATA interface.  That hack
was a transitional technique for retrofitting SSD into older computers.
The box is mostly filled with air and the SATA interface is dead-dog-slow
compared to PCIe.  A modern SSD comes on an M2 size card and plugs directly
into the PCIe bus and does not even try to pretend it is a SATA Hard Drive.
  If you are buying new storage you want a PCIe interface M.2 forms factor
SSD.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M.2



On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:49 PM linden <l...@island.net> wrote:

> Hello All,
>
>      Any one here have real world experience with reliability of Solid
> State Drives.
>
> I have not had much luck with them my self and am wondering is this
> normal or am I the exception to the rule as if you believe the
> advertising they should last almost for ever.
>
> First Experience around 2011 I bought 2 OCZ SSDs in Austria from 2
> different retailers and ran them in 2 different laptops used for office
> work travel, a little software development and running industrial
> automation service software.  Both of these failed with in 6 months with
> no prior warning just one day not recognized on boot and that was it.
> This was using Ubuntu 8.04 i think
>
> Last year I tried again and bought an AFATA SU650 Ultimate in Canada.
> This I got a little over a year ago and it failed yesterday I had some
> warning it would boot work for about 5 minutes then turn read only and
> my operating system would lock up. I got about 10 restarts like this
> before it failed to the point where it is detected by the bios but it is
> not mountable or read able. This was using Linux Mint 19 and 20.
>
> For comparison an old western digital or Toshiba mechanical drive
> usually last 4 plus years as long as not subjected to excessive shock
> and  for the most part make noise before failing completely giving you
> some warning.
>
> I am running a used Samsung SSD now as a replacement in my current
> laptop. There are obvious performance advantages but with these
> reliability issues I still don't want to put them in production linuxcnc
> machines or anything critical.
>
> Any one else have similar experience or recommendations for a reliable
> solid state drive.
>
> thanks Linden
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to