For my 1.5kw Hitachi WJ200 drive, the manual recommends 50 ohm.  However,
they want you to buy their resistor so they don't spec a recommended
wattage.  I ended up using a 400W wirewound resistor from Ohmite, part
number ARG400C50RJ.  It didn't even get warm when I was running my rigid
tapping testing with back to back reversals and the shortest ramp times
that gave reliable performance.  I'd think 400-600W should be ample for a
normal duty cycle, even on a 2.2kW drive with aggressive ramp times.

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 7:18 PM Chris Albertson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The brake resister depends on what duty cycle you run the motor at.   It
> you only run forward at a constant speed you will never use the resister.
>   But if you continuously run the motor to full forward then full backward
> speed for hours you will be heating the resister with about 50% of the
> motor's full power  So over 1KW.   Then add a "safety factor" or say 1.5
> and you get a 1.5KW resistor.  But I doubt you'd do a worst-case back and
> forth motion.
>
> One way to save a few $$ is to install a fan in the resistor with a
> thermostat.     The best load resisters I found per dollar are those ones
> on eBay made with wires over a ceramic tube.   Buy several and you can
> adjust the resistance by writing series/parallel in different combinations.
>
> A low resistance will be a more effective brake.  But do not go too low.
> Calculate the current.   If the motor has 200 volts across it and you sort
> the leads through a 1 ohm resistor then you get 200 amps and maybe the
> motor is only rated at 20 amps and you blow up the motor.
>
> The most efftive brake is a length of wire.  The worst one is an open
> circuit.   I think maybe a compromise is to use a resister then same
> inpedence as the motor.
>
> I knew some one who found he could use a stove heating element as a load.
> They are cheap
>
> Wild guess?    maybe 50R at 1 KW peak with much lower average W ratiing.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 3:25 PM Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Greetings all;
> >
> > Swapping a 110 volt vfd, for a 250 volt vfd, one of the terminals is
> > labeled differently, the common point of the fwd/rev/spd1-2-3-4-5
> > terminals on the 110 volter is labeled XGND
> >
> > But the common point terminal on the higher voltage unit is labeled DCM
> > but the diagram of how to hook up external controls is identical.
> >
> > Is there any good reason to treat it differently in hooking it to a
> > 7i76D? It should all be equ as its the presence of continuity from the
> > fwd/rev terminals to this XDNG/DCM common point that determines the
> > command.
> >
> > There is no terminal labeled neutral on this controller, only a marked
> > static ground which I ran back to the services static bar, not to the
> > neutral bar.  But my copy of the NEC is now 24 years old, so I'm asking,
> > hopefully, someone with a more recent copy.
> >
> > This is also the first vfd I've had that actually has hookups for a dump
> > resistor. 2.2 kw vfd & motor, running on 250 volt single phase, what is
> > good value and wattage for this resistor?
> >
> > Thanks folks.
> >
> > Cheers, Gene Heskett
> > --
> > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> >  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> > -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> > If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
> >  - Louis D. Brandeis
> > Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Chris Albertson
> Redondo Beach, California
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 
Matthew Herd
Email:  [email protected]
Cell:  610-608-8930

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to