I really don't know yet how much work it would be to
port STMBL to the Pico.  A stock STMBL drive, with
an STM32F405VG processor has four analog inputs
(as far as I can tell).  Those are 12bit, and can be scaled
in stmbl's local hal.  I haven't investigated the sampling
rate for those conversions.  The STM32F4xx processors
have a lot more analog inputs available, but teasing out
which ones don't conflict with needed digital i/o, and how
to route them inside the stmbl code is more than I've done.
The Pico pinout seems to indicate only 3 analog inputs.

-- Ralph
________________________________________
From: Gene Heskett [ghesk...@shentel.net]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 10:38 AM
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Another Mesa vhdl question (STMBL summary with added 
pico-pi?)


What comparison can be made between the very limited, fixed scale A-D
conversion of a mesa card's 1st 4 inputs on say a 7i76, and the A/D
speed and scaling that $4 pico-pi might be able to do when running the
STMBL code, and how fast could it do it?

Having those figures at hand would determine just how usefull the pico-pi
might be.


_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to