Hahaha yep founds those issues a few weeks ago With the compare functions
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022, 06:25 Sam Sokolik, <samco...@gmail.com> wrote: > also - you can't have spaces.. or it fails with no error. But once you > know the little nuances - it is pretty cool! > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 11:21 AM Sam Sokolik <samco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > the comma certainly tripped me up.. This isn't my first or even most > > complicated ladder - but buy - it has been a few years. Have to re-learn > > it all over. > > > > sam > > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 11:05 AM Todd Zuercher <to...@pgrahamdunn.com> > > wrote: > > > >> I think I had tried using the & symbol, and wasn't able to make it work, > >> but it is possible I was missing the key "," in the phrase (it was a > long > >> time ago.) > >> > >> Todd Zuercher > >> P. Graham Dunn Inc. > >> 630 Henry Street > >> Dalton, Ohio 44618 > >> Phone: (330)828-2105ext. 2031 > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Sam Sokolik <samco...@gmail.com> > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2022 11:55 AM > >> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > >> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Classic ladder compare blocks.. > >> > >> [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Be sure links are safe. > >> > >> In the manual - they say you can 'and' and 'or' and such.. You need a , > >> then the operator.. But I think maybe the limit is 2.. > >> > >> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flinuxcnc.org%2Fdocs%2Fstable%2Fhtml%2Fladder%2Fclassic-ladder.html%23_compare&data=05%7C01%7Ctoddz%40pgrahamdunn.com%7C257d76eef1444be9420808dad22aaaad%7C5758544c573f47cebee96c3e0806fb43%7C0%7C0%7C638053377946996653%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NtbqLQIRX68k8nj16AoAmkS0x4hS%2BKwHr8CjM6EIhhA%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> > >> - > >> > >> (, ) separate into groups example %IF1=2,&%IF2<5 in pseudo code > >> translates to if %IF1 is equal to 2 and %IF2 is less than 5 then the > >> comparison is true. Note the comma seperating the two groups of > >> comparisions. > >> > >> > >> A broad google search didn't bring up anything.. > >> > >> sam > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 9:04 AM Todd Zuercher <to...@pgrahamdunn.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Oh I misunderstood your question. Yes I think a single variable > >> > comparison block is limited to only a single comparison of a variable > >> > to one constant or another variable. I am surprised that it worked > >> > with the last two compares combined into a single block. So for your > >> > row of logic below I would have thought it would require 3 comparison > >> > blocks in a row on the same line. One each for %IW0<%W0, and %IW0>0, > >> > and %IW0<7. Are you certain your logic worked completely, and one or > >> > both of the last two were not ignored. > >> > > >> > Todd Zuercher > >> > P. Graham Dunn Inc. > >> > 630 Henry Street > >> > Dalton, Ohio 44618 > >> > Phone: (330)828-2105ext. 2031 > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Sam Sokolik <samco...@gmail.com> > >> > Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 8:57 PM > >> > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) > >> > <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > >> > Subject: [Emc-users] Classic ladder compare blocks.. > >> > > >> > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Be sure links are safe. > >> > > >> > It doesn't say anywhere in the linuxcnc manual for classic ladder - > >> > but is there a limit for the compare block to just 2 compares? > >> > ie.. > >> > > >> > I had this in the compare > >> > %IW0<%W0,&%IW0>0,&IW0<7 > >> > For the life of me the logic just wasn't working. > >> > Finally I put it in 2 separate compares.. > >> > %IW0<%W0 in one.. followed by %IW0>0,&IW0<7 > >> > > >> > This worked as expected.. > >> > > >> > BTW - the old emco turret with no feedback should work pretty darn > >> > well with a little ladder logic.. Only 1 output. (logic 0 runs the > >> turret into > >> > the pawl through a current limiting resistor.. logic 1 runs the > turret > >> > clockwise to the next tool.) > >> > > >> > > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww > . > >> > youtube.com > %2Fwatch%3Fv%3DJGGPob1iKj8&data=05%7C01%7Ctoddz%40pgrah > >> > amdunn.com > %7C257d76eef1444be9420808dad22aaaad%7C5758544c573f47cebee96c > >> > 3e0806fb43%7C0%7C0%7C638053377947152901%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIj > >> > oiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C > >> > %7C%7C&sdata=cif23wgzE%2FVAGPkRunpoNKJIEhXWuelmjvRBaNQKeaI%3D& > >> > reserved=0 > >> > > >> > The original Emco compact 5 CNC, when you would call a tool - say you > >> are > >> > at tool 1 and going to tool 3 - would stop at tool 2 and index. (it > >> stops > >> > at every tool location between the one it was at and the one you > >> > called) > >> > > >> > I think this was probably convenience as you need 2 different time > >> > delays > >> > - the initial one to go to the next one.. (slightly longer than every > >> > pocket after the first..) I am currently using 2.2 seconds for the > >> > first tool - > >> > 1.8 seconds for every tool after. > >> > > >> > kinda neat. > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Emc-users mailing list > >> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > >> > > >> > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flist > >> > s.sourceforge.net > %2Flists%2Flistinfo%2Femc-users&data=05%7C01%7Cto > >> > ddz%40pgrahamdunn.com > %7C257d76eef1444be9420808dad22aaaad%7C5758544c573 > >> > f47cebee96c3e0806fb43%7C0%7C0%7C638053377947152901%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZ > >> > sb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3 > >> > D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=v4CiNH2ZM9M7Yd8nANPRBAsjCmliUa9C4BetsWZOn0 > >> > Y%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Emc-users mailing list > >> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > >> > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flist > >> > s.sourceforge.net > %2Flists%2Flistinfo%2Femc-users&data=05%7C01%7Cto > >> > ddz%40pgrahamdunn.com > %7C257d76eef1444be9420808dad22aaaad%7C5758544c573 > >> > f47cebee96c3e0806fb43%7C0%7C0%7C638053377947152901%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZ > >> > sb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3 > >> > D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=v4CiNH2ZM9M7Yd8nANPRBAsjCmliUa9C4BetsWZOn0 > >> > Y%3D&reserved=0 > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Emc-users mailing list > >> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > >> > >> > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.sourceforge.net%2Flists%2Flistinfo%2Femc-users&data=05%7C01%7Ctoddz%40pgrahamdunn.com%7C257d76eef1444be9420808dad22aaaad%7C5758544c573f47cebee96c3e0806fb43%7C0%7C0%7C638053377947152901%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=v4CiNH2ZM9M7Yd8nANPRBAsjCmliUa9C4BetsWZOn0Y%3D&reserved=0 > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Emc-users mailing list > >> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
