I still remember the feeling of the first successful turret index on my pc
turn 55 😀

Phil T.
The Feral Engineer

Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials, machine builds and other antics at
www.youtube.com/c/theferalengineer

Help support my channel efforts and coffee addiction:
www.patreon.com/theferalengineer

Order one of the coolest label makers on the market at
http://labelworks.epson.com, use coupon code "theferalengineer" and receive
20% off of your order 🙂

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022, 9:01 PM Sam Sokolik <samco...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It doesn't say anywhere in the linuxcnc manual for classic ladder - but is
> there a limit for the compare block to just 2 compares?
> ie..
>
> I had this in the compare
> %IW0<%W0,&%IW0>0,&IW0<7
> For the life of me the logic just wasn't working.
> Finally I put it in 2 separate compares..
> %IW0<%W0 in one..  followed by %IW0>0,&IW0<7
>
> This worked as expected..
>
> BTW - the old emco turret with no feedback should work pretty darn well
> with a little ladder logic..  Only 1 output.  (logic 0 runs the turret into
> the pawl through a current limiting resistor..   logic 1 runs the turret
> clockwise to the next tool.)
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGGPob1iKj8
>
> The original Emco compact 5 CNC, when you would call a tool - say you are
> at tool 1 and going to tool 3 - would stop at tool 2 and index.   (it stops
> at every tool location between the one it was at and the one you called)
>
> I think this was probably convenience as you need 2 different time delays -
> the initial one to go to the next one..  (slightly longer than every pocket
> after the first..)  I am currently using 2.2 seconds for the first tool -
> 1.8 seconds for every tool after.
>
> kinda neat.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to