Gosh this was almost 2 years ago.  Don't even remember why I was asking.
John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Albertson [mailto:albertson.ch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: February 23, 2024 10:30 AM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Acceleration question.
> 
> It is very easy to compute the rotational momentum of a complex-shape
> flywheel.   Let�s use a simplified case as an example:  You have a 100 mm
> diameter steel disk with an 80 mm hole.  This looks like a ring made of 10 mm
> thick metal.
> 
> First compute the momentum as if there was no hole, for a solid 100 mm
> disk,    Next compute the same for an 80 mm disk.     Subtract the 80mm disk
> momentum from the 100 mm disk momentum.
> 
> If you want to account for the spokes, figure out their �average thickness� as
> if the spokes were replaced by a thin sheet of metal and add that back in.
> 
> There is a more complex way to do this but it requires Calculus.   I think 
> they
> showed us the hard way just so that they could come back and show us
> students that you could decompose any complex wheel into a set of simple
> disks and then add and subtract them.
> 
> +++++
> 
> Stepper motors CAN work.   But not if you use the simple Step/Direction
> interface most drivers offer.   The step/dir convention is NOT a function of
> the motor.  It is a function of the motor driver.  The motor itself as A+/A-,
> B+/B- leads and takes analog voltages.  It is nothing more than a two-phase
> BLDC motor with many pole pairs.   You can drive a stepper in �continuous
> and smooth non-stepping� mode if you like, if you get a smarter driver that
> can continuously vary the input voltages.  The more sophisticated controller
> can driver the motor in �torque mode� so that it supplies a specified torque.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > On Feb 23, 2024, at 10:05�AM, gene heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 6/16/22 21:57, John Dammeyer wrote:
> >> Hi Gene,
> >> Quite right.  That link I posted used a table while in fact, as you pointed
> out, the mass is mostly on the outside of a flywheel with spokes.  I would
> imagine at there is some average where if it's a 300 lb disk that is 24" 
> might be
> the same as a 36" disk that is 400 lbs.
> >> Think of a fly press for example with a clutch that engages the tooling.
> Even if it does take 5 seconds to get up to speed, the clutch engages, the 
> tool
> moves down and punches and moves up and the clutch releases.  Even if the
> speed slowed down by 20% when the clutch released then assuming linear
> acceleration now only 1 second is required to bring the speed back up.  At 50
> RPM (0.83 seconds per rev) then you could do another punch stroke 1
> second later and so possibly run 30 strokes per minute.
> >> That jpg chart I included suggests with 100% efficiency and no real 
> >> friction
> that 45 oz-in are required.   Seems very low to me hence the questions.  Even
> if I did use a stepper motor and went 16:1 to bring the RPM down to 800 RPM
> the motor could easily be a size 23 300 oz-in.
> >> Could that actually bring a flywheel up to that speed in 5 seconds?
> >
> > The closest I could come, assuming no frictional losses, would still be 
> > just a
> SWAG. But it sure seems to me a decimal point got moved or left out
> someplace.
> >
> > A stepper would be a poor choice of power unless the stepper drive also
> started at zero. A stepper unable to stay synced with the incoming step rate
> has next to zero torque. A vfd makes far more sense as you could set it for 2
> or 3x the motors FLA and the vfd would then throttle the current, using
> seriosly more drive currant immediately after a strike to get it back to 
> speed,
> but the average would still be only maintenance unless it was striking with
> every revolution. EG 50 strikes a minute. Given the time to extract and
> replace the next work piece is going to be at least a second, that would be
> one heck of a busy machine. Much the same could be said of a hirez encoder
> whose output was compared to the desired speed and a 1 horse treadmill
> motor being run by one of Jon's pwm-servos. Both solutions would need far
> less electrical power to get the job done than a steeper could do.
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: gene heskett [mailto:ghesk...@shentel.net]
> >>> Sent: June-16-22 6:34 PM
> >>> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Acceleration question.
> >>>
> >>> On 6/16/22 20:54, John Dammeyer wrote:
> >>>> OK.  I realize this will be a dumb question but please bear with me
> especially since I've included the ability
> >>> to accelerate in my Electronic Lead Screw project.
> >>>>
> >>>> A friend and I were discussing bringing a 300 pound flywheel up to
> speed.
> >>>> Vz=0 RPM, Vf=50 RPM.  Reduction drive to the flywheel shaft is 32:1 so
> final speed of motor is 1600 RPM.
> >>>>
> >>>> Assume we're happy with 5 seconds to accelerate for Tz to Tf.  Motor
> voltage is 12V.
> >>>>
> >>>> We have the mass, we have the velocity, we have the time and motor
> voltage.  The question is what are
> >>> the calculations to determine how much current the motor will require
> to create this acceleration?
> >>> Assuming of course the motor is 100% efficient.
> >>>>
> >>>> We're getting all confused with F=ma and 1/2*a*t^2 etc.
> >>>>
> >>>> What size motor is actually needed to do this?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks.
> >>>> John
> >>>>
> >>> That John, is going to be determined by where that weight is.
> >>> If 270 lbs of it is in a rim 4 feet in diameter and the other 30
> >>> is in the spokes supporting that rim, its going to take a lot
> >>> more torque to get it up to speed in 5 seconds than it would
> >>> take if its only 2 feet in diameter, its the linear speed of the
> >>> outer diameters major mass that has to be moved to twice
> >>> as many feet per second needing 4x the torque to do it for
> >>> the 4 foot example, and Einstiens E=m*v*v comes into the
> >>> picture, cuz v=2*2 is 4, but v=4*4 is 16, not 8.
> >>>
> >>> That's as close as I can get to the math, sorry. I'd have to
> >>> ask someone else for a SWAG or more knowledgeable
> >>> answer too. This is a case also, of doing a bit of cheating
> >>> with a bigger vfd running at a higher voltage and the low
> >>> speed current boost could, if enough line voltage is present,
> >>> bang a 1 horse motor hard enough to natch a 3 or 4 horse
> >>> motor, knowing the overdrive will only last a few seconds.
> >>>
> >>> But, if going to machine cut with that motor, I'd have an
> >>> amprobe or equ watching the motor currant to make sure
> >>> the steady load is within the FLA on the motors nameplate.
> >>>
> >>> I hope the real answer means you've a motor and vfd in
> >>> stock that will do it.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers, Gene Heskett.
> >>> --
> >>> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> >>>   soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> >>> -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
> >>> If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
> >>>   - Louis D. Brandeis
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Emc-users mailing list
> >>> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Emc-users mailing list
> >> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >> .
> >
> > Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET.
> > --
> > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> > -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
> > If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
> > - Louis D. Brandeis
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to