David,
Dennis has enabled builds for our maintenance streams and we still have
the builds for the head of the stream, so I think everything is in place.
Note that I've not properly incremented bundle/feature versions for the
maintenance fixes I've done in both streams. Eike Stepper and I have
been working on a tool that automatically checks for the missing
required increments much like API tooling checks for API changes and
missing corresponding version changes. We'll be able to share that tool
with the Eclipse community in the coming week (when we've finished
documenting it).
Regards,
Ed
On 07/08/2012 6:08 AM, David M Williams wrote:
Hi all,
As I hope you know :) Kepler M1 +0 is this Friday. We in the Platform
(try to) produce our (final) candidate for it Wednesday night at 8 PM
Eastern.
In the past, for Juno (at least, near the end, when I started to get
it right) we'd get EMF's "final base build" Wednesday afternoon, even
though the reset of EMF is not due until later.
How's it going for Kepler? Same plans? Will you have anything new for
Kepler M1?
From looking at
https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/emf-base-head/
it appears you have done some builds since Juno, but, none since
mid-July, and I do not yet see any "2.9 repositories" under
/home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/emf/updates
(for neither S-builds nor I-builds).
So, thought I'd ask explicitly. I'd be fine with no changes for EMF
for Kepler M1 (less work for me:) but wanted to be sure we kept our
plans in sync.
Thanks for any info.
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev
