I hate to admit I hadn't even gotten to the point of thinking of EMF 
maintenance builds!? If I should use same emf maintenance build for both 
Juno SR1 and Kepler, let me know, but otherwise will just "look around" on 
Wednesday and assume all will be obvious. 

Thanks, 
 




From:   Ed Merks <[email protected]>
To:     Eclipse Modelling Framework <[email protected]>, 
Cc:     [email protected], Eike Stepper <[email protected]>
Date:   08/07/2012 03:35 AM
Subject:        Re: [emf-dev] May I ask about EMF's Kepler M1 plans?
Sent by:        [email protected]



David,

Dennis has enabled builds for our maintenance streams and we still have 
the builds for the head of the stream, so I think everything is in place. 

Note that I've not properly incremented bundle/feature versions for the 
maintenance fixes I've done in both streams.  Eike Stepper and I have been 
working on a tool that automatically checks for the missing required 
increments much like API tooling checks for API changes and missing 
corresponding version changes.  We'll be able to share that tool with the 
Eclipse community in the coming week (when we've finished documenting it).

Regards,
Ed


On 07/08/2012 6:08 AM, David M Williams wrote:
Hi all, 

As I hope you know :) Kepler M1 +0 is this Friday. We in the Platform (try 
to) produce our (final) candidate for it Wednesday night at 8 PM Eastern. 

In the past, for Juno (at least, near the end, when I started to get it 
right) we'd get EMF's "final base build" Wednesday afternoon, even though 
the reset of EMF is not due until later. 

How's it going for Kepler? Same plans?  Will you have anything new for 
Kepler M1? 

>From looking at 
https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/emf-base-head/ 
it appears you have done some builds since Juno, but, none since mid-July, 
and I do not yet see any "2.9 repositories" under 
/home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/emf/updates 
(for neither S-builds nor I-builds). 

So, thought I'd ask explicitly. I'd be fine with no changes for EMF for 
Kepler M1 (less work for me:) but wanted to be sure we kept our plans in 
sync. 

Thanks for any info. 

  

_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev

_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev

_______________________________________________
emf-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/emf-dev

Reply via email to