funny subject indeed, I repied on the other thread... On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Rainer Döbele <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK, shame on me. > It's in the Maven staging area as sebb said. > Should have read it properly. > Well, that is not so good I must admit. > > Are any examples required in the stating area at all? > Isn't this what is supposed to go into a public repository. > So wouldn't empire-db-core and empire-db-struts2 be sufficient? > > Regards > Rainer > > > Rainer Döbele wrote: >> re: About the war (sounds funny, doesn't it) >> >> Hi Francis, >> >> I still don't see the problem. The war is not in the release and hence >> there is no problem. >> >> Rainer >> >> >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > Von: Francis De Brabandere [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Gesendet: Freitag, 11. September 2009 22:19 >> > An: [email protected] >> > Betreff: Re: About the war (sounds funny, doesn't it) >> > >> > I just added an other reply to the thread, we could just release the >> > source for those. I do agree that war has no value. >> > >> > It's just a side-effect of maven that he builds a binary for each >> > module. I'll try to find a solution for that... >> > Sorry about this, I did not think it was going to be this big of an >> > issue... >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Francis >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Rainer Döbele <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > Hi Francis, >> > > >> > > there is no war file in the distribution is there? >> > > >> > > But IMO we don't have to let Maven build one either. >> > > What is it good for? >> > > People usually run the web app from their IDE. >> > > So if this would be a problem, we just won't build one. >> > > >> > > But I really think (and hope) that sebb had some other problem. >> > > >> > > Regards >> > > Rainer >> > > >> > > >> > > Francis De Brabandere wrote: >> > >> Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5) >> > >> >> > >> >> > [X] -1 >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Distribution archives are broken. >> > >> > >> > >> > Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files. >> > >> >> > >> That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and >> notice >> > >> files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L? How do you want us >> > >> to keep track of all transitive dependencies in the future. If one of >> > >> the projects we depend on takes an extra dependency we also have to >> > >> add it, there is no easy way to handle this? >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> http://www.somatik.be >> > >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. >> > >> >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > http://www.somatik.be >> > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. >
-- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
