----------empyre- soft-skinned space---------------------- On 26/09/19 10:28 PM, Nicholas Thoburn wrote:
critical immanence to neoliberal capital, mythopoesis from the constraint or loss of the subject of labour.
I wonder how this critical immanence is to be achieved--and this is my unfinished work at present--when (at a time when, and could there be any other time?), the subject of labour is not lost but evolves as its object? when the constraint of the subject of labour is to perform, even to perform critically, even as a critically immanent or mythopoetic object?
The interruption seems to be that of the object injected into the subject, machine in the ghost: whether writing machine or embodied subject these are both animated and automated in critical immanence to neoliberal capital in order to give to it the appearance it seeks and the form that is sought for it of analytical autonomy. Of which the coils of Leviathan and scorecards of social control (Behemoth?) of which Deleuze, as you wrote, writes.
Best, Simon _______________________________________________ empyre forum [email protected] http://empyre.library.cornell.edu
