On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 6:45 AM, Goran Milovanovic <goranmilov...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> As Floh mentioned, it seems to have substandard multiplatform support, so
> it's not really a good solution for me.
>
> What I really find hard to understand, is why there's no SDL2_mixer port,
> because, as I noted before, there's a port for everything else, and
> obviously SDL_mixer_1.2 is supported internally, so it seems like it should
> be possible to make SDL2_mixer work with emscripten.
>

It should be possible, yeah. I think it's just that the other solutions are
good enough for most people, so no one was motivated to port SDL2_mixer
yet. But it would be great if someone did.

Btw, it should be possible to mix SDL1 audio with everything else from
SDL2, the implementations should not collide (but I didn't verify this).


>
> On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 6:11:24 PM UTC-4, Alon Zakai wrote:
>>
>> Another option is OpenAL.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Александр Гурьянов <caii...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I prefer to use SDL_mixer_1.2 it works fast. Also it supports ogg, mp3
>>> panning and dinstance.
>>>
>>> 2017-08-29 21:55 GMT+07:00 Goran Milovanovic <goranm...@gmail.com>:
>>> > I would like to compile a project that's built on top of SDL2
>>> libraries. One
>>> > of those libraries is SDL2_mixer, which seems to have no emscripten
>>> port ...
>>> > I find that strange, because there's a port for everything else (even
>>> > SDL2_net), and audio seems like one of the more fundamental
>>> requirements for
>>> > a large number of applications.
>>> >
>>> > So, I'm just wondering why there's no port for SDL2_mixer, and what
>>> people
>>> > typically do for sound+music support (I hope it's something other than
>>> "use
>>> > SDL1").
>>> >
>>> > Thanks.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups
>>> > "emscripten-discuss" group.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an
>>> > email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "emscripten-discuss" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "emscripten-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to