The new method runs the whole application in a web worker. This will require WebAssembly multithreading to ship first, so it's still a couple of months away from browsers having that, but you can try it out with -s PROXY_TO_PTHREAD=1 linker option. There are a couple of PRs coming in to improve its support with Wasm, OffscreenCanvas and HTML5 event proxying that hopefully should land soon.
2017-11-21 17:52 GMT+02:00 Александр Гурьянов <[email protected]>: > Hmm, I have an project (Dune 2) that uses emterpreter. The Dune 2 > project, contains a lot of cycles like: > while (true) { > // do some animation stuff > // usually: shift pallete + render > } > > or > while (true) { > // do read input > // for example: save game dialog (enter file name) > } > > With emterpreter porting is super easy (but result is slow). How new > superior option will avoid this cycles? I want to try it. > > > 2017-11-21 22:00 GMT+07:00 Jukka Jylänki <[email protected]>: >> It's notable here that ASYNCIFY (and also EMTERPRETER) both have a >> good path of becoming redundant once Wasm multithreading is available, >> because then we can run all APIs synchronously for greatly simplified >> porting. For example, synchronously asking stdin for input will be >> possible just out of the box with ASMFS (I have a PR adding that >> support in the pipes). So if someone is kind of on the edge of >> "perhaps I might need this" - there's a superior build option coming - >> use the linker flag -s PROXY_TO_PTHREAD=1 in current incoming to >> utilize this already now in its early stages. >> >> 2017-11-18 5:11 GMT+02:00 Alon Zakai <[email protected]>: >>> The ASYNCIFY docs have said this for a long time now: >>> >>>> This feature is experimental, and not recommended. See the Emterpreter for >>>> a more recent option with similar functionality, that is currently >>>> supported. >>> >>> Is anyone still using it? And if so, is anyone interested to maintain it? >>> >>> - Alon >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "emscripten-discuss" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "emscripten-discuss" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "emscripten-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
