Readers may be interested in this comparison between the emterpreter and asyncify - https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/wiki/Emterpreter#comparison-to-asyncify
In summary, ASYNCIFY: is probably faster than emterpreter, definitely produces larger output than emterpreter and won't work with exceptions (emterpreter does). On 21 November 2017 at 15:52, Александр Гурьянов <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm, I have an project (Dune 2) that uses emterpreter. The Dune 2 > project, contains a lot of cycles like: > while (true) { > // do some animation stuff > // usually: shift pallete + render > } > > or > while (true) { > // do read input > // for example: save game dialog (enter file name) > } > > With emterpreter porting is super easy (but result is slow). How new > superior option will avoid this cycles? I want to try it. > > > 2017-11-21 22:00 GMT+07:00 Jukka Jylänki <[email protected]>: > > It's notable here that ASYNCIFY (and also EMTERPRETER) both have a > > good path of becoming redundant once Wasm multithreading is available, > > because then we can run all APIs synchronously for greatly simplified > > porting. For example, synchronously asking stdin for input will be > > possible just out of the box with ASMFS (I have a PR adding that > > support in the pipes). So if someone is kind of on the edge of > > "perhaps I might need this" - there's a superior build option coming - > > use the linker flag -s PROXY_TO_PTHREAD=1 in current incoming to > > utilize this already now in its early stages. > > > > 2017-11-18 5:11 GMT+02:00 Alon Zakai <[email protected]>: > >> The ASYNCIFY docs have said this for a long time now: > >> > >>> This feature is experimental, and not recommended. See the Emterpreter > for > >>> a more recent option with similar functionality, that is currently > >>> supported. > >> > >> Is anyone still using it? And if so, is anyone interested to maintain > it? > >> > >> - Alon > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "emscripten-discuss" group. > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > >> email to [email protected]. > >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to [email protected]. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "emscripten-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
