LLVM LTO in general should be safe IIUC. At least when using upstream llvm I don't know of any issues. Perhaps there is something different with fastcomp that I'm not aware of. Perhaps we should remove that from the docs. On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 3:34 PM Александр Гурьянов <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi. I tried it couple of times. Problem is in undefined behaviour my > code works correctly most of time, but sometimes unpredictable erros > are happen. I decide to not use them, because it is impossible to > prove that output is working correctly. > > ср, 10 окт. 2018 г. в 0:09, Corey Lucier <[email protected]>: > > > > We really wish to lean on LLVM link time optimizations. > > > > The Emscripten docs say . "LLVM LTO is not perfectly stable yet, and can > > cause code to behave incorrectly.". > > > > Does this note still apply? There's nothing saying what particular > > scenarios are problematic and I can't find equivalent docs in the LLVM > > project itself. > > > > So...are you guys actively discouraging it's use? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Corey > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "emscripten-discuss" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to [email protected]. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "emscripten-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
