I'm compiling all my stuff with "--llvm-lto 1" and haven't seen problems so far, so from my point of view it's robust. My code isn't very complex but at least the Oryol samples have a nice assortment of 3rd party libs (e.g. Bullet Physics and several UI frameworks):
http://floooh.github.io/oryol-samples/index.html https://floooh.github.io/tiny8bit/ On Wednesday, 10 October 2018 00:09:15 UTC+2, Corey Lucier wrote: > > We really wish to lean on LLVM link time optimizations. > > The Emscripten docs say . "LLVM LTO is not perfectly stable yet, and can > cause code to behave incorrectly.". > > Does this note still apply? There's nothing saying what particular > scenarios are problematic and I can't find equivalent docs in the LLVM > project itself. > > So...are you guys actively discouraging it's use? > > Thanks, > > Corey > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
