--llvm-lto 1 hasn't changed, it still passes the flags to LLVM to do LTO. It's still useful as there are many things LLVM LTO can do that binaryen LTO can't (because LLVM IR has richer information than wasm, and because LLVM is more mature and powerful). As before, it can increase build times substantially.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:52 AM Floh <[email protected]> wrote: > > Binaryen does whole-program optimization because most people don't use > LLVM's LTO > > ...hmm, what are the implications when I'm compiling with "--llvm-lto 1"? > Is the LLVM-LTO pass essentially redundant now and only increases link > time, or is the binaryen whole-program-optimization pass missing important > features from LLVM's? > > Cheers, > -Floh. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "emscripten-discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/3661fc55-6099-467d-b01a-b6f3754a3c36%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/3661fc55-6099-467d-b01a-b6f3754a3c36%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/CAEX4NpT-cFGiQ%3DT3gBmDkHOz3a%3DCRTKo%3D6Scj4nT3CxcciRrag%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
