Thanks for the clarification! On Monday, 10 June 2019 16:22:46 UTC+2, Alon Zakai wrote: > > --llvm-lto 1 hasn't changed, it still passes the flags to LLVM to do LTO. > It's still useful as there are many things LLVM LTO can do that binaryen > LTO can't (because LLVM IR has richer information than wasm, and because > LLVM is more mature and powerful). As before, it can increase build times > substantially. > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:52 AM Floh <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> > Binaryen does whole-program optimization because most people don't use >> LLVM's LTO >> >> ...hmm, what are the implications when I'm compiling with "--llvm-lto 1"? >> Is the LLVM-LTO pass essentially redundant now and only increases link >> time, or is the binaryen whole-program-optimization pass missing important >> features from LLVM's? >> >> Cheers, >> -Floh. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "emscripten-discuss" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/3661fc55-6099-467d-b01a-b6f3754a3c36%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/3661fc55-6099-467d-b01a-b6f3754a3c36%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "emscripten-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/246bcf5c-f429-44fa-b5cf-29c88f4db494%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
