>>>>> "Tschofenig," == Tschofenig, Hannes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tschofenig,> Hi Sam,
>> >>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Tschofenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>>
Hannes> Hi all, before we spend more time considering EAP
Hannes> tunneling methods like PEAP and TTLS I would like to hear
Hannes> the opinion of our ADs on this subject. So far, the
Hannes> working assumption was that EAP methods that tunnel EAP
Hannes> are outside the scope of the working group. These
Hannes> statements were also repeated during the IETF#68 EMU WG
Hannes> meeting by our ADs.
>> I at least don't recall objecting to a tunnel method. If
>> you're going to do a tunnel method you do need cryptographic
>> binding when tunneling something that generates a key.
Tschofenig,> I recall that you rejected the TTLS approach where we
Tschofenig,> would have to add EAP support into TLS. I am also
Tschofenig,> happy to hear that you like providing EAP support in
Tschofenig,> TLS.
Yes, I reject that approach to tunnelsing. But you could for example
use the TLS application record protocol to tunnel EAP.
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
