Hi, > Implementations traditionally have found it difficult to start one EAP > method, and then to switch to another one. This means that v2-only > implementations may be difficult to deploy in practice.
That would speak for assigning a new EAP type code for v2, wouldn't it? EAP method (re)negotiation is well-tested, and known to work across many supplicants. That way, a v2-only implementation wouldn't need to rely on in-EAP-method version negotiation and whacky switching. Greetings, Stefan Winter >> Is it expected that most implementations will support v1 and v2? >> >> Is it desired that people be able to create a v2 only implementation? > I will partially avoid those two questions, and say that it should be > possible to deploy only the EMU tunneled method. > > Alan DeKok. > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
