Sam Hartman wrote: > I think we discussed the flow in a fair bit of detail and I think we > have consensus on the current flow including the lack of server telling > the peer which channel binding attributes it supports. As an > individual, I do not support opening that up again, although if there is > WG consensus to make a change we should do so.
I think there's been a lot of discussion on the document. We need to get closure quickly. This means not re-opening issues which were previously discussed and decided. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
