> Alan DeKok <[email protected]>; wrote: > > Hmm... if the changes are too complex, it may be better to have a new > document. I have a first draft written, and will be publishing it soon. It's > only about 12 pages, but it goes through a lot of detail that is likely not > relevant for the EAP-TLS document. >
Make sense, let's continue the discussion when you have published the new document. 12 pages of details unrelated to EAP-TLS sounds like a new document. > It still may be useful to give guidance in the EAP-TLS document. e.g.: Agree. I have added the updates you suggested (Type-Code in context_value, paragraph about other TLS-based EAP methods) to the GitHub version. Cheers, John _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
